A Lucrative but Controversial Deal
Roger Stone, a former adviser to Donald Trump's presidential campaign, has been criticised for lobbying Myanmar's military-backed government. Stone's firm was hired in 2016 to rebuildWashington's relations with the Myanmar government. He was paid $50,000 monthly for his services.
Breaking news
Solar Power Surpasses Coal in US Energy Production
Social Media Firms Face Landmark Lawsuits
Private Credit Lenders Face AI Reckoning
Voter Discontent Threatens Leaders WorldwideStone's involvement with Myanmar's government has raised eyebrows due to the country's poor human rights record. The military has been accused of atrocities against the Rohingya minority. Critics argue that Stone's lobbying efforts may have helped legitimise the government's actions.
Stone's firm, Black, Manafort & Stone, was paid to improve Myanmar's image in the US. The firm's work included arranging meetings with US officials and advising on how to navigate the American political landscape. Stone's involvement has been defended as a legitimate business arrangement.
Is Lobbying the Junta Legitimate?
Critics argue that Stone's actions may have helped the Myanmar government evade international scrutiny. The US has imposed sanctions on Myanmar's military leaders due to human rights abuses. Stone's lobbying efforts may have undermined these efforts.
The conviction of Stone for obstructing a congressional investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election has raised further questions about his involvement with Myanmar's government. The case has highlighted concerns about the influence of lobbyists on US foreign policy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Roger Stone's role in lobbying for Myanmar's government? Stone's firm was hired to improve Myanmar's image in the US and advise on navigating the American political landscape. He was paid $50,000 monthly.
Why has Stone's involvement with Myanmar's government been criticised? Critics argue that Stone's lobbying efforts may have helped legitimise the government's human rights abuses and evade international scrutiny.
What are the implications of Stone's conviction for his lobbying work? The conviction has raised further questions about the legitimacy of Stone's involvement with Myanmar's government and the influence of lobbyists on US foreign policy.
