Turkey says the new Israeli government will test whether hostilities will survive Netanyahu

In addition, Kalin added that neither

An assessment of Israeli policy in the light of the new administration: the Turkish perspective

In the context of the negotiations on the formation of the Israeli government, led by Gadi Eisenkot, Ankara sources stress that the emergence of a new administration is a decisive test. This change of leadership will reveal whether the tensions between the two nations stem from the fundamental doctrine of the Israeli state or from specific decisions made under Benjamin Netanyahu. This was stated by the head of Turkish intelligence, Ibrahim Kalin, at a conference organised by the Turkish think tank Orsam in Ankara on Monday.

Kalin clarified that the Republic of Turkey has no intention of initiating a conflict with Israel. Instead, he considers that the coming administration should focus on de-escalating the tense situation. He stated that Turkey is closely monitoring the process of forming a government in Israel.

It is important to note that Turkey does not have bilateral disputes with Israel that are not related to the situation in Palestine. This Palestinian issue is, according to Kalin, the primary cause of the deterioration of relations between the two states. He underlined Turkey's proactive historical position, noting that Ankara is the first Muslim nation to recognize Israel, establishing diplomatic, political and economic relations with it. He also stated without hesitation that Turkey does not question the existence of Israel.

The Turkish perspective is a just request: Turkey urges Israel to treat the Palestinian people with dignity, stop the occupation and abandon annexation acts. Any rupture in relations between the two sides, Kalin explained, has its roots in the way Israel handles the Palestinian situation.

In addition, Kalin added that neither the Turkish leadership nor its society could remain indifferent or ignore Israeli actions, especially in the context of the massacres in Gaza and the West Bank, where thousands of people lost their lives.

Analyzing the global context, Kalin mentioned that he believes that Israeli citizens, especially those who do not belong to Netanyahu's Likud party, understand that the country's policy over the last two or three years has led to unprecedented isolation on the international scene. He pointed out that this is a critical moment, set amid serious events such as genocide and violence.

This sense of global change is supported by external observers. Kalin pointed to recent statements by US President Donald Trump, made for the 60 Minutes program, as evidence of declining international support for Israel. He suggested that Israel should revise its strategies because it has more concerns than Turkey.

These statements were made by Ragip Soylu

Despite the non-aggression stance, Kalin acknowledged that tensions had escalated. He attributed this increase to Israeli expansionism in Lebanon, the West Bank and Syria, which creates regional instability, specifically mentioning their intention to recover more territory , which is an undeniable fact.

In conclusion, the Turkish intelligence chief strongly reiterated that Turkey has no intention of entering the conflict or treating Israel as an enemy state. He concluded with a clear appeal: They are the ones who need to change.

These statements were made by Ragip Soylu on Monday, 11 September 2026, at 11:38. An illustrative image, captured by Adem Altan/AFP, shows a protester wearing a mask depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a pro-Palestinian demonstration in Ankara on October 7, 2026.

In parallel with these developments, it is noted that the Israeli President has chosen Eisenkot in place of Netanyahu for the efforts to form a new government. This underscores Israel's domestic political dynamics, which directly influences foreign relations with Turkey.

The Turkish perspective is not just a reaction to events, but a principled position based on Palestinian rights and regional stability. This approach is fundamentally different from the current Israeli narrative, according to Kalin's analysis.

It is important to note that, although tensions are evident, Turkey maintains its status as a historic partner, based on recognition and multidimensional relations, not antagonism.

This detailed analysis provides a balanced perspective on the critical moment in Turkey-Israel relations, waiting to see whether the new government will adopt an escalatory path or perpetuate hostility related to the previous administration.